X3® with Advanced Bearing Technology
Latest Technology in Wear Performance
Many things including patient weight, activity level as well as the implant’s
bearing surface technology, can affect the longevity of the implant.
The bearing surface is defined as the two parts of the joint replacement that
glide together throughout motion. Stryker’s new, advanced bearing technology,
called X3
®, has been shown to significantly reduce wear in laboratory testing.
This decrease in wear may contribute to the longevity of your implant. This
technology is only available from Stryker.
Learn more about:
- Wang A, Manley M, Serekian P. “Wear and Structural Fatigue Simulation
of Crosslinked Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene for Hip and Knee
Bearing Applications.” In: Kurtz SM, Gsell R, and Martell J, eds.
Crosslinked and Thermally Treated Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene
for Joint Replacements; ASTM STP1445. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International;
2003:151-168.
- Stryker® Orthopaedics Test Report: RD-03-082.
- Stryker® Orthopaedics Triathlon™ CR Tibial Inserts
made from X3® UHMWPE, 5530-G-409 show a 68% reduction in
volumetric wear rate versus the same insert fabricated
from N2\Vac™ gamma
sterilized UHMWPE, 5530-P-409. The insert tested was
4, 9 mm thick. Testing was conducted under multiaxial knee
simulator (multi-station MTS knee joint simulatora) for five
million cycles using appropriate size CoCr counterfaces, a
specific type of diluted calf serum lubricant and the motion
and loading conditions, representing normal walking,
outlined in ISO/DIS 14243-3. Volumetric wear rates were 17.7 ± 2.2
mm3/106 cycles for standard polyethylene inserts and
5.7 ± 1.5
mm3/106 cycles for test samples. Test inserts were exposed
to a gas plasma sterilization process. In-vitro knee
wear simulator tests have not been shown to quantitatively
predict clinical wear performance.a
- Stryker® Orthopaedics Triathlon™ PS Tibial Inserts
made of X3® UHMWPE, 5532-G-409 show a 64% reduction in
volumetric wear rate versus the same insert fabricated from N2\Vac™ gamma
sterilized UHMWPE, 5532-P-409. The insert tested was Size 4,
9 mm thick. Testing was conducted under multiaxial knee simulator
(multi-station MTS knee joint simulatora) for five million cycles
using a size 7 CoCr counterfaces, a specific type of diluted
calf serum lubricant and literature or fluoroscopy based motion
and loading conditions representing stair climbing.b,c Volumetric
wear rates were 3.6 ± 0.61 mm3/106 cycles for standard
polyethylene inserts and were 1.3 ± 0.44 mm3/106 cycles
for test samples. Test inserts were exposed to a gas
plasma sterilization process. In vitro knee wear simulator
tests have not been shown to quantitatively predict clinical
wear performance.a
- Stryker® Orthopaedics Trident® Acetabular Inserts
made of X3® UHMWPE (unsterilized), 721-00-32E, show a 97%
reduction in volumetric wear rate versus the same insert fabricated
from N2\Vac™ gamma sterilized UHMWPE, 620-00-32E. The insert
tested was 7.5 mm thick with an inner diameter of 32 mm. Testing
was conducted under multi-axial hip joint simulation for 5 million
cycles using a 32 mm CoCr articulating counterface and calf serum
lubricant. X3® UHMWPE Trident® acetabular inserts showed
a net weight gain due to fluid absorption phenomena but yielded
a positive slope and wear rate in linear regression analysis.
Volumetric wear rates were 46.39 ± 11.42 mm3/106 cycles
for N2\Vac™ gamma sterilized UHMWPE inserts and 1.35 ± 0.68
mm3/106 cycles for X3® UHMWPE (unsterilized) Trident® Acetabular
Inserts. Although in-vitro hip wear simulation methods
have not been shown to quantitatively predict clinical wear
performance, the current model has been able to reproduce correct
wear resistance rankings for some materials with documented
clinical results.d,e,f
- a. Essner A, et. al. “A simulator for the evaluation of
total knee replacement wear”, 5th World Biomaterials
Congress, Toronto, Canada, May 1996,
pg 580.
b. Riener R, et. al. “Stair ascent and descent at different
inclinations”,
Gait and Posture 15: 2002, pg. 32-44.
c. Morrison JB. "Function of the knee joint in various
activities",
Biomedical Engineering, 4: 1969, pg. 573-580.
d. Wang A, et al. Tribology International, Vol. 31, No. 1-3:17-33, 1998.
e. Essner A. et al. 44th Annual Meeting, ORS, New Orleans, Mar. 16-19, 1998:774.
f. Essner A. et al. 47th Annual Meeting, ORS, San Francisco, Feb. 25-28, 2001:1007.